Informing thoughtful engagement with our culture and media.

"/>

World Views

in Media

Mars, Inc. Halloween Woke Virtue Signaling

Mars, Inc is an international food and nutrition company, among it's divisions is Wrigley, which is responsible for their candy line. One of their products is Twix, the subject of a controversial TV commercial. The commercial is not about eating Twix candy at all. Instead they are soliciting our attention to announce that they (Mars, Inc.) are a "woke" corporation and embrace transgender ideology, just because they can. Among the messages that this commercial conveys, in a not so subtle way, is that you better get on board with us or you will be destroyed. Gender dysphoria is a mental illness that should not be normalized by our society at large nor made into commercials meant to shame children into accepting this.  If I were a stakeholder in this company I would ask their Corporate Board if this was a wise use of company funds and how much income we would expect from airing this commercial? The answers should be no and zero respectively.

Click for Twix Commercial

Posted by Art Flickinger

Halloween Celebrations In A Post Christian Society

Halloween was depicted by Norman Rockwell as pictures of kids throwing sheets over their heads vying for treats, pumpkin carvings and bobbing for apples. During my childhood, Charles Schultz came out with his epic cartoon about the coming of "The Great Pumpkin," in a decade it was slasher movies, and today all manner of demonic occult movies. Halloween has become much darker and more reflective of its Celtic roots than most people realize. Listen to Albert Moehler as he opines about Halloween and the Christian Worldview. In addition he talks about an article from the USA Today, What to do when Johnny wants to be a princess for Halloween? 

Click Here for Albert Moehler

 

 

 

Posted by Art Flickinger

University of Pittsburgh A Fetal Tissue Hub

Judicial Watch and the Center for Medical Progress have received 252 pages of documents from the Department of Health and Human Services, obtained by a lawsuit filed  by Judicial Watch on behalf of The Center for Medical Progress under the FOIA. The documents reveal that HHS funded the University of Pittsburgh to the tune of approximately 3 million dollars for the University's ongoing efforts to become a "tissue hub" for human fetal tissue. The purpose of this "tissue hub" is to create a pipeline for the acquisition, quality control and distribution of human fetal organs for the GUDMAP (GenitoUrinary Development Molecular Anatomy Project) Study. In the proposal Pitt notes that they have been collecting  fetal tissue for over 10 years, including, livers, hearts,  gonads, brains , kidneys , ureters, bladders and legs. Pitt boasts strong working connections  with UPMC facilities including a lab  with a "Butcher Boy" band saw for sectioning bone and a frozen section lab with digital feeds to surgeons and for show and tell.   The tissues are collected through a collaborative process including Family Planning, Obstetrics and Pathology departments. (Pitt's tissue bank is imbedded  in UPMC's Department of Pathology) In the proposal Pitt records "the warm ischemic time" on samples to ensure the highest quality specimens. Warm ischemic time is defined as the amount of time an organ remains at body temperature after blood supply has been cut off.  "These documents show taxpayer money being used to turn the University of Pittsburgh into a one-stop human fetal tissue shop- from procuring the tissue from elective abortion. 'subdividing' the human remains, to distributing and shipping the harvested tissue," stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

Fox news reported, 9/30/2021 that multiple Physicians reported to them that Pitt's previous statement alluded to the possibility that organs were extracted from live fetuses. Last week nearly 100 federal lawmakers sent letters to the Biden Administration suggesting Pitt's federally funded research might have utilized tissue from illegal abortions. Pitt has denied all allegations and has hired a D.C. Law firm to investigate and will release its' findings in 18 months.

The Law firm Pitt hired to investigate has Pitt alumni on its investigatory team and has limited the scope of the investigation to the University and not UPMC. The possibility of a conflict of interest here has been raised to the Board of Trustees President Thomas E. Richards. Richards responded that this was without merit.

There are several things that do not pass the smell test here. Why does it take 18 months to  do an investigation? Why does the University hire a Pitt friendly law firm to conduct the investigation? If the charges are true there are human fetuses being butchered alive for their body parts, surely this calls for an emergent investigation.If Pitt wants to be transparent and has nothing to hide, they should make the effort to reconvene The Federal Tissue Advisory Board that contains credentialed scientists grounded in medical ethics to review the research. (Biden recently disbanded it).  An alumni stacked  law firm smacks of a cover up. This will all be swept under the rug. Our state and federal government not to mention the national news media are all radically pro-abortion and will be complicit  along with Pitt in its coverup.                                 

         

 

 

 

Posted by Art Flickinger

12...891011121314151617 ... 6162