Informing thoughtful engagement with our culture and media.

"/>

World Views

America 250 Years

 

Twenty score and ten years ago our forefathers wrote and signed a document we know as The Declaration of Independence. Its purpose was to declare our independence from Great Britain and announce it to the world. The genius of the document was that it not only declared our independence, but also served as a framework for the Constitutional Republic we have today. Thomas Jefferson was the primary author but not without the benefit of tedious hours of debate and editing by the Continental Congress for its approval. The founders were educated men, many of whom studied in England, so they were steeped in ancient history of the Greek and Roman Empires as well as English and European history. Of interest to the founders were the British civil wars fought between the King and Parliament between 1642 and 1651. Losing one's head over the outcomes of these wars was a common fate for the vanquished. King James the II whose father, Charles I, had been beheaded, ordered the deceased Oliver Cromwell's body, dug up, beheaded and displayed on a pike from London Bridge. You can cross the Thames on London Bridge but you can not cross the King. The seriousness of the action they were taking was not lost on the founders.

Turning the Divine Right of Kings on its head, no pun intended, Jefferson, in the first two paragraphs of the Declaration set the foundation of his argument based on "The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God." He acknowledges implicitly that all men are made in the image of God (Imago Dei), and because of this our rights come to every man equally, from our Creator, which no man can give to us or take away. 

"We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

The triumvirate of rights, "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness," was meant to be an all-encompassing summary of the fundamental moral principles that guide decision making for both individuals and governments. The pursuit of happiness brings to mind a hedonistic pursuit of pleasure and riches. However, Happiness, as defined in the 18th. Century Scottish Enlightenment, was the pursuit of wisdom and virtue, in order to live a good life as a child of God.

The founders, based on their Christian beliefs, held that Government should support morality and virtue grounded in the laws of nature and of nature's God. Our Government ought not to be hostile to the Christian faith and enact laws unfriendly to it, but to encourage its flourishing. This was not the creation of a Christian theocracy nor a nod to a secular state. The First Amendment of our Constitution prohibits the establishment of a national religion, or preference of one religion over another, or any religion over non-religion. Article VI bars any religious test as a qualification for holding any federal office. It is a balance for religious neutrality for governing purposes.

I will leave you with a portion of George Washington's farewell speech to the nation in which he embraces faith and morality as pillars of society and a warning not to do away with them. His address is quite prophetic as to what we see happening in today's divisive political climate.

"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. The mere politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect and to cherish them. A volume could not trace all their connections with private and public felicity. Let it simply be asked where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths, which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice? And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle." -George Washington

I ask you. Where is the security for reputation, when we misuse the levers of power in the government to "legally" attack political enemies? Where is the security for life, when we allow the deaths of innocent human beings residing in the womb, by statute? Where is the security for Justice, when we pervert oath's to uphold and protect the constitution, and we allow an unmitigated deluge of immigrants to enter our country threatening our sovereignty? These are all being perpetrated on us by "the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure." This is the post-modern worldview held by elites that have taken an axe to the roots of Western Civilization and our Republic. Benjamin Franklin foresaw the future struggles for America ahead of us, when he was asked after the Constitutional Convention, "what kind of Government do we have?" He answered,"A Republic if we can keep it." So on this 250th. anniversary of the signing of The Declaration of Independence, let us pledge "our lives and our fortunes" to keep it that way!

 Below are a couple of Patriotic Songs I love. The first is Chester, written and sung during the war. Second, is Ray Charles rendition of America the Beautiful and finally The Battle Hymn of the Republic as only Johnny Cash can narrate and sing it. Goose bumps and chills guaranteed or maybe you have the hunta virus.

Chester- Revolutionary War Song  

America The Beautiful

Battle Hymn of The Republic- Johnny Cash

Memorial Day 2026- Fallen But Not Forgotten

Fallen But Not Forgotten

May flowers bloom near whitewashed tombs blanketing our heroes resting below.

They answered the call and gave their all, never thinking that day would come

 Our sons and daughters gone in a flash

 their life's blood watering the Liberty Tree

For 250 years the tree has grown strong 

its roots have run deep

steeped in patriots blood

Always remember they died for us to be free

be humbled to know the sacrifice they have sown

was given at such great cost

all they ask in return is to never forget their name and why they're engraved

on the whitewashed stone

above where they are laid to rest

May flowers bloom near whitewashed tombs blanketing our heroes resting below.

They answered the call and gave their all, never thinking that day would come

 

 

 

A Canadian Conundrum

The Canadian Institute for Health Information released statistics that reported 17 babies were born alive following botched abortion procedures of second and third trimester babies in 2025. Canadian Criminal law (s223) states that "any infant born alive, under any circumstance, is a legal person," and therefore that infant is required to receive medical care. These babies were born in the  Alberta Provincial Health System and thus were not only entitled to receive care but were required by law to have that care. Unfortunately this is not what happened. According to a opinion piece for the Western Standard written by Richard Dur, the executive director of Prolife Alberta, these infants were left to die. What exactly does it mean to be, "left to die?" I'll tell you, and it's beyond inhumane. These infants are abandoned to a cold room until they expire, no fluids, no nutrition, no incubator, no blanket, no mothers heartbeat or familiar scent to comfort them, NOTHING! This process may last several hours to days. Doctors are encouraged to stop the heart of the baby in utero, prior to the procedure,so that chances of a live birth are not likely. In response to Robert Dur's article Alberta's Health minister, Adriana LaGrange said," As our law stands, any child who survives birth is a human being and deserves respect," and promised to look into allegations that laws were not being followed.

The response of Alberta's Health Minister is puzzleling to me in several ways. First, the acknowledgement that these allegations need to be "looked" into, is a bureaucratic side step if I ever saw it. These "allegations" are public record and are easily uncovered to be factual in nature. The police and the Canadian version of a DA need to be notified and a criminal investigation needs to be opened. Secondly, recognizing the fact that these children are human beings and a citizens of Canada, entitled to medical care and protection under the law, flies into the face of legalized abortion in the first place. What are these children in utero, are they non-humans until they travel down and out of the mother's birth canal? Or even more absurd, do they only become human beings by surviving the deadly gauntlet of an abortion procedure? What are these babies called growing in the wombs of women who want them? So the only difference is if you want your child they are human beings, but if you don't want them they are non-human and can be aborted, but they magically become human again only if they survive an abortion procedure.

I'm not here to throw rocks at the Canadian's lack of a moral compass as we are equally guilty of killing our own unborn. Canada as well as America have weakened or lost the Christian Worldview that has been the bulwark of the rise and triumph of Western Civilization for over a 1000 years. It is what has made America great. If we don't reclaim it we will fall and fall hard.

Previous12345678910 ... 6364